<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Richard French&#039;s Weblog &#187; Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.richardfrench.net/category/media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.richardfrench.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 19:59:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is Slashdot for sale &#8211; if not should it be?</title>
		<link>http://www.richardfrench.net/2011/02/22/is-slashdot-for-sale-if-not-should-it-be/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richardfrench.net/2011/02/22/is-slashdot-for-sale-if-not-should-it-be/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 04:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freshmeat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geeknet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osdn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slashdot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sourceforge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinkgeek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardfrench.net/?p=5439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many years ago I ran a subsidiary of VA Linux called OSDN. OSDN consisted of 11 websites and three businesses. These 3 business were the e-commerce business Thinkgeek, a subscription business called Animation Factory and a media business consisting of &#8230; <a href="http://www.richardfrench.net/2011/02/22/is-slashdot-for-sale-if-not-should-it-be/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many years ago I ran a subsidiary of VA Linux called OSDN. OSDN consisted of 11 websites and three businesses. These 3 business were the e-commerce business <a href="http://thinkgeek.com" target="_blank">Thinkgeek</a>, a subscription business called <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.animationfactory.com" target="_blank">Animation Factory</a> and a media business consisting of <a rel="nofollow" href="http://slashdot.org" target="_blank">Slashdot</a>, <a rel="nofollow" href="http://sourceforge.net" target="_blank">Sourceforge</a>, <a rel="nofollow" href="http://freshmeat.net" target="_blank">Freshmeat</a>, Newsforge, Themes, and <a rel="nofollow" href="http://linux.com" target="_blank">Linux.com</a>. All 3 businesses became profitable towards the end of  2003 and had an annual revenue in 2004 of approximately $24M.</p>
<p>Today, the business is known as <a href="http://geek.net" target="_blank">Geeknet</a>. Much of the old OSDN has gone, yet a few of the key assets remain. Animation Factory was sold several years ago to Mecklermedia. What remains today is the e-commerce business Thinkgeek and a scaled down media operation consisting of the sites: Slashdot, Sourceforge and freshmeat.</p>
<div style="display: none;">Do you need <a href="http://www.olnevhost.net/vps-hosting.html"><strong>vps hosting</strong></a>?</div>
<p>Geeknet made many major changes in 2010, including:</p>
<p>1. Thinkgeek revenues grew 55% to $76M<br />
2. Media revenues grew 11% to $18M<br />
3. Kenneth Langone and the Geeknet board eliminated the entire media management team<br />
4. Sold media sites: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ohloh.net/" target="_blank">Ohloh</a> and <a rel="nofollow" href="http://Geek.com" target="_blank">Geek.com</a><br />
5. Moved it&#8217;s headquarters from California to Fairfax, VA, home of Thinkgeek</p>
<p>The growth of Thinkgeek is amazing and the team should be congratulated. The e-commerce business and the media business are two different businesses with widely different business models. With a 55% annual growth perhaps Geeknet should concentrate on this business and phase out and sell off the media business. I don&#8217;t know if this is Geeknet&#8217;s current strategy &#8211; if it is then keep an eye out for sales of Slashdot, freshmeat and Sourceforge. If it&#8217;s not, then perhaps it should be. AOL, Google, IDG and Ziff Davis would be a good fit for Geeknet&#8217;s media sites.</p>
<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="none" data-text="Is+Slashdot+for+sale+-+if+not+should+it+be%3F" data-url="http://www.richardfrench.net/2011/02/22/is-slashdot-for-sale-if-not-should-it-be/"  data-via="RFx140">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script><img src="http://www.richardfrench.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=5439&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richardfrench.net/2011/02/22/is-slashdot-for-sale-if-not-should-it-be/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A funny Christmas Letter</title>
		<link>http://www.richardfrench.net/2008/12/05/a-funny-christmas-letter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richardfrench.net/2008/12/05/a-funny-christmas-letter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Letter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardfrench.net/2008/12/05/a-funny-christmas-letter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s that time of year again when holiday cards come with those unpersonalized letters that explain everything a family has done for a year, interspersed with several photos and printed on a single page. If you&#8217;re thinking about a humorous &#8230; <a href="http://www.richardfrench.net/2008/12/05/a-funny-christmas-letter/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s that time of year again when holiday cards come with those unpersonalized letters that explain everything a family has done for a year, interspersed with several photos and printed on a single page. If you&#8217;re thinking about a humorous alternative check out one of my favorites that was written for 2000.  Barbara and I are working on a shorter version for SMS that I&#8217;ll share next week.</p>
<p>From a <a href="http://www.anickoftime.ca/xmas/xmletter.html">Nick of Time</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>Dear Friend,<br />
It is that time of year again to share with you our adventures in this journey we call life. 2000 has been another year of magic and wonder&#8230;</p>
<p>Lori almost 3, is quite a talker. She continues to amaze the professors at the University with her intuition in foreign languages. It was fun for her to serve as Official Translator for Warren Christopher at the Bosnian-Serbian Peace Talks. She intends to spend this Holiday transcribing War and Peace into Arabic and Cantonese.</p>
<p>Chris, now 5, is growing in leaps and bounds. When he got his first set of building blocks he seemed quite interested in large buildings. This year he designed his first skyscraper and ground was broken in Hong Kong for the new &#8220;Little Man&#8221; Towers. It is great to have a budding architect at home as he made a new addition to the house and a wonderful gazebo for our garden. Martha Stewart will be filming her next show here in April.</p>
<p>Betsy had a very busy year. In between her work as President of the American Cancer Society and Senior Partner of Goldman Sachs, she introduced a line of children&#8217;s novels and hand made active-wear. She remains occupied with the children and has introduced them to Yoga and power walking this year. We are particularly proud of Mom as a starting forward representing the United States in the World Cup.</p>
<p>Dave was immersed with his Graduate School studies, and managed to co-author a paper on Multidimensional Customer Attribute Analysis by Conjoint Survey and accept a Nobel Prize for his discoveries in Quantum Physics. Along the way Dave took three startups through their IPO. We are proud of his work serving on the Board of Directors of IBM, Coca-Cola, and Walt Disney. Dad was also active with the kids teaching Lauren Ballet and helping to lower Chris&#8217; handicap to 5. We were able to squeeze a little traveling in this year. We started in Aspen, went to Belarus, the Congo, Denmark, Ethiopia, the Falklands, Greenland, Holland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, New Zealand, Venezuela, and Zaire. Our trip sailing our new boat around the world was a great experience for the kids, we learned to communicate with Dolphins and discovered a new region of deep water volcanoes.</p>
<p>And Sergeant, our German shepherd, learned to speak. Latin. Other than that, it was a very quiet year. So from our household to yours, all the Blessings of the Season and may your New Year be prosperous. We found out yesterday that we won the $150 Million Powerball Lottery.</p>
<p>The Wannabes,<br />
Betsy, Dave, Chris &#038; Lori</p></blockquote>
<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="none" data-text="A+funny+Christmas+Letter" data-url="http://www.richardfrench.net/2008/12/05/a-funny-christmas-letter/"  data-via="RFx140">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script><img src="http://www.richardfrench.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=5164&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richardfrench.net/2008/12/05/a-funny-christmas-letter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If only &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.richardfrench.net/2008/12/04/if-only/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richardfrench.net/2008/12/04/if-only/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hindsight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardfrench.net/2008/12/04/if-only/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hindsight is 20-20. The record labels have never had great foresight, otherwise they may now been offering concerts, ticketing, merchandise, and many non-music ways to make money. This one beats it all. Seymour Stein as quoted in the Globe and &#8230; <a href="http://www.richardfrench.net/2008/12/04/if-only/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hindsight is 20-20. The record labels have never had great foresight, otherwise they may now been offering concerts, ticketing, merchandise, and many non-music ways to make money.  This one beats it all. Seymour Stein as quoted in the <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20081203.wwff03/BNStory/Entertainment/Music/">Globe and Mail</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Stein says the rot set in the music industry 60 years ago. &#8220;We blew it,&#8221; he says on the phone from his office in New York. &#8220;The first major music labels were all phonograph manufacturers, but by the time the Beatles came along, most companies were no longer involved in the hardware.</p>
<p>&#8220;Had we remained in control of the hardware,&#8221; he adds. &#8220;We wouldn&#8217;t be hurting as much as we are now. And the iPod would be ours.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="none" data-text="If+only+..." data-url="http://www.richardfrench.net/2008/12/04/if-only/"  data-via="RFx140">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script><img src="http://www.richardfrench.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=5163&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richardfrench.net/2008/12/04/if-only/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Real Sarah Palin on SNL</title>
		<link>http://www.richardfrench.net/2008/10/19/the-real-sarah-palin-on-snl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richardfrench.net/2008/10/19/the-real-sarah-palin-on-snl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarah palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardfrench.net/2008/10/19/the-real-sarah-palin-on-snl/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://widgets.nbc.com/o/4727a250e66f9723/492807b6885b67d8/48fb7c6896eb1d25/cff46d85/-cpid/5815e4a9d3992a3c" id="W4727a250e66f9723492807b6885b67d8" width="384" height="283"><param name="movie" value="http://widgets.nbc.com/o/4727a250e66f9723/492807b6885b67d8/48fb7c6896eb1d25/cff46d85/-cpid/5815e4a9d3992a3c" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="all" /></object></p>
<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="none" data-text="The+Real+Sarah+Palin+on+SNL" data-url="http://www.richardfrench.net/2008/10/19/the-real-sarah-palin-on-snl/"  data-via="RFx140">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script><img src="http://www.richardfrench.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=5162&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richardfrench.net/2008/10/19/the-real-sarah-palin-on-snl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Hollywood Panel</title>
		<link>http://www.richardfrench.net/2007/06/17/digital-hollywood-panel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richardfrench.net/2007/06/17/digital-hollywood-panel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 05:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardfrench.net/2007/06/17/digital-hollywood-panel/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, I was a panelist at Digital Hollywood. As usual I was invited to speak to issues around the intersection of technology, digital entertainment business models and content licensing. It turned out to be a great discussion. I suspect &#8230; <a href="http://www.richardfrench.net/2007/06/17/digital-hollywood-panel/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, I was a panelist at <a href="http://www.digitalhollywood.com/07DHSpring/DHSp07Thurs3.html">Digital Hollywood</a>.  As usual I was invited to speak to issues around the intersection of technology, digital entertainment business models and content licensing. It turned out to be a great discussion. I suspect that the panel moderator, Mike McGuire of Gartner, had hoped to pit us against each other, and to a certain extent he did. In fact we did not agree that outdated copyright laws and complex content licensing are a bad thing.</p>
<p>The panel split into two groups, the lawyers and the entrepreneurs. We had very different perspectives on how to solve the difficulties, complexities and time involved in negotiating content licensing, especially for new tech enabled entertainment startups.</p>
<p>Technology now enables us to push the edge of the envelope with new entertainment business models. Consumers and artists are ready to try new approaches. In fact, one audience member suggested that Creative Commons offers a solid alternative to the current approach. </p>
<p>This panel, reinforced my opinion that the greatest obstacle to new entertainment business models may be outdated copyright laws and not content pirates or fear of technology.</p>
<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="none" data-text="Digital+Hollywood+Panel" data-url="http://www.richardfrench.net/2007/06/17/digital-hollywood-panel/"  data-via="RFx140">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script><img src="http://www.richardfrench.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=5136&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richardfrench.net/2007/06/17/digital-hollywood-panel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How old Google Earth &#8212; What&#8217;s up CNET?</title>
		<link>http://www.richardfrench.net/2006/07/30/how-old-google-earth-whats-up-cnet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richardfrench.net/2006/07/30/how-old-google-earth-whats-up-cnet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 21:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Earth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardfrench.net/?p=5118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent CNET article &#8220;Why isn&#8217;t Beirut burning in Google Earth?&#8221; the author points out that in Google Earth, the skies over Beirut are clear, the grass is green and the buildings are standing. The article goes on to &#8230; <a href="http://www.richardfrench.net/2006/07/30/how-old-google-earth-whats-up-cnet/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent CNET article <a href="http://news.com.com/2061-10803_3-6100011.html?part=rss&#038;tag=6100011&#038;subj=news">&#8220;Why isn&#8217;t Beirut burning in Google Earth?&#8221;</a>  the author points out that in Google Earth, the skies over Beirut are clear, the grass is green and the buildings are standing.  The article goes on to say that according to a Google spokesperson, the images come from Digital Globe and are updated, on average, every year to 18 months.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://news.com.com/5208-12-0.html?forumID=1&#038;threadID=19781&#038;messageID=169208&#038;start=-">one comment</a>, it&#8217;s at least 30 months since Google has updated their neighbourhood in Google Earth.  On the Google Earth website <a href="http://earth.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=21414">questions and answers section</a> it states: &#8220;Google Earth acquires the best imagery available, most of which is approximately one to three years old.&#8221;</p>
<p>Since Google&#8217;s search and other products and services seem to be real time, why wouldn&#8217;t we expect Google Earth results in real time? Are we expecting too much &mdash; I believe so. I&#8217;m just happy for services like Google Earth and look forward to the day when the entire planet is covered.  Obviously, the first information to be real time for Google Earth and similar services will be related to traffic in urban communities in Asia, Western Europe and North America, where GPS and personal navigation markets are growing fastest.</p>
<p>While Google, is one of the top aggregators for text based <a href="http://news.google.com/">news</a>, it is hardly a top source for visual news.  CNET should be careful for what it&#8217;s wishing for.</p>
<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="none" data-text="How+old+Google+Earth+%26mdash%3B+What%27s+up+CNET%3F" data-url="http://www.richardfrench.net/2006/07/30/how-old-google-earth-whats-up-cnet/"  data-via="RFx140">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script><img src="http://www.richardfrench.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=5118&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richardfrench.net/2006/07/30/how-old-google-earth-whats-up-cnet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Searching for Search Growth &#8212; The Truth is Still Out There</title>
		<link>http://www.richardfrench.net/2006/03/06/searching-for-search-growth-the-truth-is-still-out-there/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richardfrench.net/2006/03/06/searching-for-search-growth-the-truth-is-still-out-there/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 22:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardfrench.net/?p=3689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the last week, Nielson//NetRatings and comScore Media Metrix, two competing Internet measurement companies, both released their search engine results &#8212; with contradictory findings and implications for GYM. Tables 1 &#038; 2 show Nielson//NetRatings results while Table 3 shows comScore &#8230; <a href="http://www.richardfrench.net/2006/03/06/searching-for-search-growth-the-truth-is-still-out-there/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
<!--
.darkgreysmalltext {
	font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
	font-size: 10px;
	font-style: normal;
	line-height: normal;
	font-weight: lighter;
	color: #333333;
	text-decoration: none;
}
.tablediv {
	border-bottom-width: 1px;
	border-bottom-style: solid;
	border-bottom-color: #CCCCCC;
}</p>
<p>.tableborder {
	border: 1px solid #999999;
}
-->
</style>
<p>In the last week, Nielson//NetRatings and comScore Media Metrix, two competing Internet measurement companies, both released their search engine results &mdash; with contradictory findings and implications for GYM.  Tables 1 &#038; 2 show Nielson//NetRatings results while Table 3 shows comScore Media Metrix results.  Here is a link to the <a href="http://www.nielsen-netratings.com/pr/pr_060302.pdf">Nielson//NetRatings press release in pdf</a> or <a href="http://industry.tekrati.com/research/news.asp?id=6588">in html</a> at Tekrati and a link to <a href="http://www.comscore.com/press/displaycontent.asp?press=764&#038;suffix=pdf">comScore press release in pdf</a>.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s interesting is the degree of the difference and the implications that can be derived.</p>
<p>According to Nielson//Netratings, searches grew by 1.6 billion or 39%, January 2006 over January 2005.  It looks like the growth is very good, not quiet as high as the same period in earlier years &mdash; but trending well.  According to comScore Media Metrix, search grew by half a billion or 11%, January 2006 over January 2005. Now the alarm bells are ringing and I&#8217;m wondering whether search engines and media sites that derive significant revenue from partnering with these search engines (like Google Adsense), are a worthwhile investment.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s even more confusing is share percentage increase.  Looking at one set of numbers Google &#038; Yahoo only slightly increased.  Looking at the other set of numbers Google had a good increase while Yahoo lost 3 points.</p>
<p>It seems the only thing that both agree upon is the fact that Google is still the leader and still pulling away from its competitors.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><b>Table 1. Total Online Searches, Jan 2005 vs. Jan 2006 (U.S.), According to Nielson//NetRatings</b></p>
<table width="400" align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" class="tableborder">
<tr>
<td class="tablediv">
<div class="darkgreysmalltext"><b>&nbsp;Month</b></div>
</td>
<td class="tablediv">
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="right"><b>Online Searches (000)&nbsp;&nbsp;</b></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext">&nbsp;January 2005</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="right">4,085,880&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext">&nbsp;January 2006</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="right">5,699,528&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext">&nbsp;Y-O-Y Growth</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="right">39%&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><em>Source: Nielsen//NetRatings, February 2006</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><b>Table 2: Search Share Rankings (U.S.), According to Nielson//NetRatings</b></p>
<table width="400" align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" class="tableborder">
<tr>
<td class="tablediv">
<div class="darkgreysmalltext"><b>&nbsp;Search Engine</b></div>
</td>
<td class="tablediv">
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="center"><b>Jan 2005<br />Search Share</b></div>
</td>
<td class="tablediv">
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="center"><b>Jan 2006<br />Search Share</b></div>
</td>
<td class="tablediv">
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="center"><b>Precentage<br />Change</b></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext">&nbsp;Google Search</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="right">47.1%&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="right">48.2%&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="right">1.1%&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext">&nbsp;Yahoo! Search</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="right">21.2%&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="right">22.2%&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="right">0.9%&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext">&nbsp;MSN Search</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="right">12.8%&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="right">11.0%&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="right">-1.8%&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><em>Source: Nielsen//NetRatings, February 2006</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><b>Table 3: Total Internet Searches and Share of Online Searches by Engine, January 2006 vs. January 2005 &mdash; Total U.S. Home, Work and University Internet Users, According to comScore Media Metrix</b></p>
<table width="400" align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" class="tableborder">
<tr>
<td class="tablediv">
<div class="darkgreysmalltext">&nbsp;</div>
</td>
<td class="tablediv">
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="center"><b>Searches<br />Jan 2005<br />Billions</b></div>
</td>
<td class="tablediv">
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="center"><b>Searches<br />Jan 2006<br />Billions</b></div>
</td>
<td class="tablediv">
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="center"><b>Precentage<br />Change</b></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tablediv">
<div class="darkgreysmalltext"><em>&nbsp;Total Internet Searches</em></div>
</td>
<td class="tablediv">
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="center">4.95&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
<td class="tablediv">
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="center">5.48&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
<td class="tablediv">
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="center">10.7%&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" class="tablediv">&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tablediv">
<div class="darkgreysmalltext"><em>&nbsp;Share of Searches by Engine</em></div>
</td>
<td class="tablediv">
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="center"><b>Jan 2005<br />%</b></div>
</td>
<td class="tablediv">
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="center"><b>Jan 2006<br />%</b></div>
</td>
<td class="tablediv">
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="center"><b>Share Point<br />Change<br />+/-</b></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext">&nbsp;Google Sites</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="right">35.1%&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="right">41.4%&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="right">+6.3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext">&nbsp;Yahoo! Sites</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="right">31.8%&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="right">28.7%&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="right">-3.1&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext">&nbsp;MSN-Microsoft Sites</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="right">16.0%&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="right">13.7%&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="right">-2.3&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext">&nbsp;Time Warner Network</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="right">9.6%&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="right">7.9%&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="right">-1.7&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext">&nbsp;Ask Jeeves</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="right">5.1%&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="right">5.6%&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="darkgreysmalltext" align="right">+0.5&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><em>Source: comScore qSearch</em></p>
<p>Technorati Tag: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Media" rel="tag">Media</a></p>
<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="none" data-text="Searching+for+Search+Growth+%26mdash%3B+The+Truth+is+Still+Out+There" data-url="http://www.richardfrench.net/2006/03/06/searching-for-search-growth-the-truth-is-still-out-there/"  data-via="RFx140">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script><img src="http://www.richardfrench.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=3689&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richardfrench.net/2006/03/06/searching-for-search-growth-the-truth-is-still-out-there/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Record online ad revenues in Q4 2005</title>
		<link>http://www.richardfrench.net/2006/03/01/record-online-ad-revenues-in-q4-2005/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richardfrench.net/2006/03/01/record-online-ad-revenues-in-q4-2005/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 22:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardfrench.net/?p=3542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a press release today by The Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB), they and PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) performed a joint study and found that Internet advertising revenues for 2005 are estimated to exceed $12.5 billion. &#8230; a 30% increase over the &#8230; <a href="http://www.richardfrench.net/2006/03/01/record-online-ad-revenues-in-q4-2005/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a <a href="http://www.iab.net/news/pr_2006_03_01.asp">press release</a> today by The Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB), they and PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) performed a joint study and found that Internet advertising revenues for 2005 are estimated to exceed $12.5 billion.</p>
<blockquote><p><em> &#8230; a 30% increase over the previous revenue record of $9.6 billion in 2004. The 2005 Q4 revenues totaled a record $3.6 billion; making it the second consecutive quarter to surpass the $3 billion mark and the highest quarter reported. Fourth quarter revenues represent a 35 percent increase over the same period in 2004 and a 17 percent increase over Q3 of 2005.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>I wonder what the split is between search based advertising and banner advertising &mdash; perhaps the IAB can tell us when their report is made available in April.</p>
<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="none" data-text="Record+online+ad+revenues+in+Q4+2005" data-url="http://www.richardfrench.net/2006/03/01/record-online-ad-revenues-in-q4-2005/"  data-via="RFx140">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script><img src="http://www.richardfrench.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=3542&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richardfrench.net/2006/03/01/record-online-ad-revenues-in-q4-2005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Slashdot on the block?</title>
		<link>http://www.richardfrench.net/2006/02/10/is-slashdot-on-the-block/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richardfrench.net/2006/02/10/is-slashdot-on-the-block/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slashdot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardfrench.net/?p=2797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In today&#8217;s article in CNNMoney.com entitled Is Slashdot the future of Media?, an idea was floated that Slashdot, and even VA Software, should be snapped up by another media company. But it seems to me that any media company aiming &#8230; <a href="http://www.richardfrench.net/2006/02/10/is-slashdot-on-the-block/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In today&#8217;s article in CNNMoney.com entitled <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/02/09/technology/fastforward_fortune/index.htm">Is Slashdot the future of Media?</a>, an idea was floated that Slashdot, and even VA Software, should be snapped up by another media company. </p>
<blockquote><p><em>
<p>But it seems to me that any media company aiming to go deep into the modern world of user-generated media might want to think about buying this gem. Investment bankers, take heed.</p>
<p>Not only that, but whomever bought VA Software would be buying critical DNA &#8212; knowledge about what software the world is using. Sourceforge.net has essentially no competition, so effectively it has created a marketplace of producers and consumers. </p>
<p></em></p></blockquote>
<p>Perhaps, my suggestion on January 3, 2006 in <a href="http://www.richardfrench.net/?p=1363">VA Software sells Animation Factory. Is there more to come?</a> that VA Software divest of its media assets has been taken to heart and articles such as this are great ways to drum up interest.  Or maybe VA Software itself is for sale and pushing its hottest media properties <a href="http://slashdot.org">Slashdot</a> and <a href="http://sourceforge.net">Sourceforge</a> along with its affinity with Open Source, as the reason to buy the entire package.</p>
<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="none" data-text="Is+Slashdot+on+the+block%3F" data-url="http://www.richardfrench.net/2006/02/10/is-slashdot-on-the-block/"  data-via="RFx140">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script><img src="http://www.richardfrench.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=2797&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richardfrench.net/2006/02/10/is-slashdot-on-the-block/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VA Software sells Animation Factory &#8212; Is there more to come?</title>
		<link>http://www.richardfrench.net/2006/01/03/va-software-sells-animation-factory-is-there-more-to-come/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richardfrench.net/2006/01/03/va-software-sells-animation-factory-is-there-more-to-come/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 00:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animation Factory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JupiterMedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sourceforge Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardfrench.net/?p=1363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was very surprised to see that VA Software had sold the Animation Factory assets to JupiterMedia. This brings an additional $9.35M cash to the company, bringing the total equity to approximately $55M. Is this a single event, or is &#8230; <a href="http://www.richardfrench.net/2006/01/03/va-software-sells-animation-factory-is-there-more-to-come/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was very surprised to see that <a href="http://www.vasoftware.com/news/press.php/2005/1552.html">VA Software</a> had sold the <a href="http://www.animationfactory.com">Animation Factory assets</a> to <a href="http://www.jupitermedia.com">JupiterMedia</a>. This brings an additional $9.35M  cash to the company, bringing the total equity to approximately $55M. Is this a single event, or is this the start of a strategy to re-invent the company?  I hope it&#8217;s a re-invention. This is what I&#8217;d also like to see.</p>
<ol>
<li>Quickly grow the equity by selling off the rest of the e-commerce business (Thinkgeek).</li>
<li>Divest of the media business (<a href="http://www.slashdot.org">Slashdot</a>, <a href="http://www.freshmeat.net">freshmeat</a>, <a href="http://www.newsforge.com">Newsforge</a>, <a href="http://www.itmj.com">ITMJ</a> and <a href="http://www.linux.com">Linux.com</a>), but keep <a href="http://www.sourceforge.net">Sourceforge.net</a>.</li>
<li>Change the name of the company to Sourceforge Corp, &mdash; there is far more brand equity in Sourceforge than VA Software.</li>
<li>Change the stock ticker symbol from LNUX to SFRG.</li>
</ol>
<p>Steps 1 &#038; 2 should yield at least another $50M to $100M cash. Maybe Novell or Red Hat would be interested in the Linux.com url. If done correctly it would free up a significant server farm that could be used for the new Sourceforge on Demand ASP solution. By keeping one or two of the media ad sales team, revenue from ads on sourceforge.net would be easily accomplished.  The cash on hand might very well be used to purchase companies that fit with the sourceforge business and result in faster company growth.</p>
<p>Of course this is wishful thinking. As the former executive who turned around OSTG, I would like to see VA Software succeed at last, and see OSTG become a part of a larger media business where it can take advantage of media synergies.</p>
<p>Technorati Tag: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Open+Source" rel="tag">Open Source</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Software" rel="tag">Software</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Slashdot" rel="tag">Slashdot</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Sourceforge" rel="tag">Sourceforge</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Media" rel="tag">Media</a></p>
<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="none" data-text="VA+Software+sells+Animation+Factory+%26mdash%3B+Is+there+more+to+come%3F" data-url="http://www.richardfrench.net/2006/01/03/va-software-sells-animation-factory-is-there-more-to-come/"  data-via="RFx140">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script><img src="http://www.richardfrench.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=1363&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richardfrench.net/2006/01/03/va-software-sells-animation-factory-is-there-more-to-come/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

